Trump vs. Powell: Can the US President Really Fire the Fed Chair?

With inflation concerns rising and interest rates in focus, President Donald Trump has made no secret of his disdain for Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. But despite the frustration, the question remains: can a U.S. president actually fire the Fed Chair?

The Legal Trap: Independence by Design

Legally, firing Powell isn’t simple. The Federal Reserve was created to function independently, protected from political pressure. The Chair serves a four-year term and can only be removed “for cause”—a term that has never been clearly defined or tested. Does “cause” mean corruption, gross misconduct, or just bad policy decisions? No one knows, and no court has clarified it.

Even Trump’s predecessors, including Nixon and Reagan, who clashed with the Fed, never crossed the line. So far, the tradition of central bank independence has held firm.

Trump’s Playbook: Delay, Signal, or Disrupt

That doesn’t mean Trump is powerless. He could wait until Powell’s term ends in 2026 and appoint a successor with his economic ideology—someone who favors lower rates and looser monetary policy.

Or he could introduce a “shadow chair”—a nominee who speaks loudly and publicly about reversing Powell’s course. Markets respond to expectations, and the Fed relies on signaling. A well-timed voice from Trump’s team could steer sentiment without a single policy change.

But the real wildcard lies in the Supreme Court. A pending case, Trump v. Wilcox, could grant presidents more control over independent agencies. If the ruling goes Trump’s way, the legal wall shielding Powell might crumble.

Still, even without a legal battle, Powell is feeling the heat. And in central banking, perception can be just as powerful as policy.

Make money without lifting your fingers: Start using a world-class auto trading solution.

EightCap, your trusted Partner in CFDs, Cryptocurrencies and Stocks.